All Writing

I have been doing research on this recently, going through menus and deal listings across the boroughs to find where the actual value is hiding. Here is what I found, organized by type.

French Prix Fixe: More Than You Would Expect for the Price

A French prix fixe lunch is one of the better known deals for people who work in Midtown, but most people do not realize how far the value actually goes. A fixed price gets you two or three courses during a midday window on weekdays. The rooms tend to be calm. The food tends to be real restaurant cooking, not a pared-down lunch version.

Here are the spots that stood out in my research.

Restaurant	Neighborhood	Deal	Hours
Paname Petite Brasserie	Midtown East (2nd Ave & 56th St)	2 courses $23 / 3 courses $26	Daily, noon to 3pm
Boucherie West Village	West Village (7th Ave South)	3 courses $33	Mon to Fri, 11am to 4pm
Red Eye Grill	Midtown (7th Ave)	2 courses $32	Weekdays only
Copinette	Midtown East (1st Ave & 50th St)	3 courses $34	Mon to Fri, noon to 3:30pm

Paname is the standout value on paper. Three courses for $26 in Midtown, with a menu that includes escargot, crab cakes, chicken paillard, and creme brulee. That is not a discounted menu. It is just an honest price for a French restaurant that wants to fill seats at lunch.

Boucherie gives you the widest window, 11am to 4pm, which creates real flexibility for either a late morning or early afternoon meal. Three courses includes soup or salad plus a main like mushroom ravioli or croque monsieur.

Copinette runs a strong three course menu with crispy tortellini, grilled branzino, and pappardelle ragu. Steak frites is available as a $15 supplement if you want to go further, but the base menu already looks like more than you paid for.

Pizza and Italian Casual: The Everyday Lunch

This is where the range gets wide. New York has hundreds of Italian spots running weekday lunch specials. Most of what I found lands between seven and fifteen dollars and includes a drink. The best of them are genuine meals, not just filler.

Here is what the menus show across the boroughs.

Restaurant	Neighborhood	Starting Price	What Is Included
Big John’s Pizza and Pasta	Queens Village, Queens	$4.75	Daily rotating hero or pasta special
Sicily’s Best Pizzeria	Bushwick, Brooklyn	$7.00	Pasta or burger with fries, 11am to 4pm
Michelangelo’s Pizzeria	West Brighton, Staten Island	$8.50	Wrap, gyro, hero, or personal pie with soda or water
Dino’s Pizzeria	Riverdale, Bronx	$9.00	Hero or pasta with mini wedge, soda, and fries or salad
Plaza Pizza	Staten Island	$9.95	Entree with drink
Joe’s Pizza and Pasta	Woodhaven, Queens	$9.99	Pasta, entree, or panini with drink, 11am to 3pm
Genesis Pizza	Flushing, Queens	$10.40	Hot hero, pasta, or wings with fries and free soda
Bklyn Pizza	Bushwick, Brooklyn	$11.56	Heroes and pizzette, 11am to 3pm
Bari’s Pizza	Staten Island	$12.00	Entree with drink
Rosebank Pizza	Rosebank, Staten Island	$13.50	Wide selection with a can of soda
Goodfella’s Brick Oven	Hylan Blvd, Staten Island	$16.00	Entree with side salad and beverage, 11am to 3pm

Big John’s in Queens Village is the most remarkable thing on this list in terms of pure value. Their menu shows a different special every day of the week. Monday is meatball hero. Tuesday is chicken. Wednesday is eggplant. Thursday is sausage. Friday cycles back to meatball. Specials start at $4.75. In 2026, in New York, that number is striking.

Dino’s in Riverdale posts a $9 all in lunch that bundles a mini wedge, a soda, your choice of fries or salad, and a full hero or pasta. That combination of price and completeness is harder to find than it should be.

Genesis in Flushing lists hot heroes, baked pastas, or wings with fries and a free drink at $10.40 across the board. The menu is long and the pricing is consistent, which is usually a good sign.

What Makes a Lunch Deal Worth It

Not every lunch special is actually a deal. Some are just the regular menu with a fountain soda added at the same price as ordering them separately. Here is what separates a real deal from a dressed-up regular order.

What to look for	What to avoid
The price is lower than ordering items separately	A regular entree plus a soda at the same total price
The special is available consistently throughout the week	Specials that disappear seasonally or change without notice
A drink is included, not just listed as an add-on	A drink listed at an additional charge that erases the savings
The window is long enough to eat without feeling rushed	A 90 minute technical window with obvious table-turning pressure

The pattern in my research is that the best deals come from restaurants using lunch to fill seats during slower hours. French spots use prix fixe menus to attract the midday crowd. Pizza shops run specials to compete with fast food. The ones that do it honestly tend to also be the ones where the food and the room reflect some actual care.

My Current Top Picks by Category

Category	Pick	Why
French prix fixe	Paname Petite Brasserie	Three courses for $26 in Midtown including dessert
Budget Italian	Big John’s, Queens Village	Daily rotating specials from $4.75
Midrange Italian	Dino’s Pizzeria, Riverdale	$9 all in with salad, soda, and a full entree
Upscale casual	Goodfella’s, Staten Island	$16 with salad and drink from a brick oven
Best time window	Boucherie West Village	11am to 4pm, which gives you real flexibility

This list will keep growing as I find more worth adding.

How high school friends, college roommates, and old coworkers quietly become an audience

The Framework: A Two-Axis Map of Every Relationship in Your Life

I think about relationships on a simple grid. Two axes. Four quadrants.

The vertical axis measures depth. How much does this person matter to you emotionally? Do you trust them with the real stuff? Would you call them at 2am?

The horizontal axis measures proximity. How much do they show up in your daily life? Do you share a commute, a lunch spot, a neighborhood? Do they see you on a bad Tuesday?

Plot anyone in your life on that grid and you get one of four zones.

The Core Circle sits in the top right. High depth, high proximity. Your partner, your local best friend, a sibling you live near. These people know you in real time.

The Anchors Afar sit in the top left. High depth, low proximity. Your high school best friend who moved across the country. Your college roommate. The coworker you were genuinely close to before one of you left. The emotional bond is real, but the daily contact is gone.

The Circumstantial Network sits in the bottom right. Low depth, high proximity. Coworkers. Neighbors. The barista who knows your order. They shape your daily environment but not your inner life.

The Distant Periphery sits in the bottom left. Low depth, low proximity. Acquaintances. People you follow online. And, as I will get to, something more uncomfortable than either of those.

The Reminiscence Window

When a friendship moves from the top right to the top left, it does not die immediately. There is a window.

For a while, you still have shared memory to draw from. You can call this person, say “remember when,” and both of you feel the warmth of it. That connection is real, and some friendships live in this space for years.

But the window does not stay open forever.

As time passes, the shared memories get older. They become stories you have both already told. And at some point, the conversations shift. You are no longer reminiscing. You are reporting.

The Problem with Long Distance Friendships: Why Quadrant 2 Is Unstable

Relationships in the top left are structurally unstable. Not because the love goes away, but because love alone does not hold a relationship in its original position on the grid.

What holds it there is shared reality. The texture of being in the same world. When proximity is gone, that dissolves. And without active effort, a top-left friendship drifts downward.

This happens with high school friends after everyone scatters. It happens with college friends after graduation. It happens with coworkers after someone leaves. The relationship was built in a specific environment, and when that environment ends, the foundation quietly shifts.

The Pipeline: How Long Distance Communication Becomes Content Production

The drift moves through stages.

First comes reporting. You can no longer observe each other casually, so you fill each other in. This is natural.

Because you cannot report everything, you start curating. You pick the stories worth telling. The small, formless stuff gets left out.

Then comes performing. The curated updates get polished. You think about how to tell the story before you tell it.

And finally, if you let it go long enough, you arrive at what I call contentification. The relationship now consists entirely of two people producing digital content for an audience of one. Long voice notes. Scheduled calls. A text thread that reads like a newsletter exchange. It has all the surface features of closeness, but something essential is gone.

Mutual Parasociality: When Both People Become Each Other’s Audience

A parasocial relationship is the one-sided feeling of connection you have with someone who does not know you exist. A podcaster. An athlete. A creator you have followed for years.

What I am describing is different.

When a friendship decays all the way through that pipeline, it lands in a state I call mutual parasociality. Both people still care. Both people still show up. But what they are showing up for is a performance. Person A is consuming a curated version of Person B. Person B is consuming a curated version of Person A.

The relationship feels alive because of its history. But the thing that created that depth, which was shared reality and being seen before you had a chance to prepare, is no longer running.

Why This Matters More If You Live Digitally

Digital communication makes the content pipeline feel invisible. When everything is a message or a post or a call, it is easy to confuse activity with connection.

If you zoom out and look at where most of your connections actually sit on the grid, especially the ones you feel close to, you might find that a lot of them have quietly drifted to the bottom left corner. Not as a moral failure. Just as what distance does over time when digital tools give you the feeling of closeness without the substance.

Of the people you feel connected to right now, how many actually know what your life looks like this week? Not the version you put in a voice note. The actual texture of it.

Can Mutual Parasociality Be Reversed?

Yes. But not by messaging more often.

The way back is through shared reality, and there are a few ways to create it even across distance.

Exchange ideas, not updates. When you share an idea and someone pushes back on it or builds on it, you are thinking together. That is a form of shared reality even without physical proximity.

Meet in person. An afternoon together does more for a relationship than months of scheduled calls. You exist in the same physical moment, and that is something digital cannot replicate.

Have a real impact on each other’s lives. Ask for something. Offer something. Give advice that actually changes a decision. Connect someone to a person or an opportunity. When you matter to each other’s actual lives, you move back up the grid.

The friendships worth keeping are the ones where at least one of these is possible.

Where Do You Sit on the Grid?

Most of us carry a mental model of our relationships based on how they used to feel. The high school friend who was once your closest person. The college roommate who knew everything about you. The coworker who made a hard job worth showing up to.

Those histories are real.

But where are those relationships now on the grid? And where do you want them to be?

What matters in a three martini lunch spot:

You need to be able to get in early. You need to be near transit. You need a martini program that takes itself seriously. And you need a room that signals this is a real meal.

After comparing research from multiple sources, I kept coming back to five places.

Del Frisco’s Double Eagle Steakhouse

1221 Avenue of the Americas at Rockefeller Center

This place opens at 11:00 AM on weekdays, which immediately puts it ahead of most competitors. The room is a three story space with floor to ceiling windows looking out at Rockefeller Center.

The martini program is confident. They do classic dry and dirty martinis with quality spirits, and their bar menu has a lunch bundle that pairs a martini with oysters, Caesar salad, and fries for $39. That is a smart entry point if you want to pace yourself before ordering heavier plates.

I would come here for the filet medallions or the tuna poke bowl. You can wear a suit without feeling overdressed, and you can get out quickly if you need to. The E train to JFK is close, and Penn Station is a short walk for Newark or Long Island connections.

Cost for three martinis and a full meal runs $160 to $300 depending on what you order.

Le Rock

45 Rockefeller Plaza

Le Rock also opens at 11:00 AM on weekdays, and it has the most developed martini program of any place on this list. They call it Martinis Maison, and it includes a Reverse Martini, a Gibson, a Vesper, a Dirty, and a 50/50. Each one is $24.

This is a French brasserie, so the food skews toward steak frites, filet au poivre, sole meunière, and an omelette with caviar. The room has arched skylights and Art Nouveau touches. It reads as polished without being overly formal.

Le Rock does not lean on steakhouse tradition. It is doing its own thing, and it does it well. Three martinis plus an entree and maybe a starter will run you $150 to $260.

The location in Rockefeller Plaza makes airport access straightforward.

The Dynamo Room

2 Pennsylvania Plaza above Penn Station

The Dynamo Room opens at 11:30 AM for lunch, Tuesday through Thursday only. That narrow window is worth noting.

What makes this place different is the mini martini option. You can order a mini Gibson, Dirty, Vesper, or Cosmo for around $12, or go standard for $22. If you plan to have three martinis at lunch, the mini format lets you enjoy the ritual without losing your afternoon.

The food is steakhouse leaning with a raw bar, hanger steak frites, and an express lunch menu. It sits on top of Penn Station, so if you are headed to Newark or JFK via train, this is the most convenient choice.

Three minis and a meal will cost you $120 to $220.

The Grill

99 East 52nd Street in the Seagram Building

The Grill does not open until 11:45 AM, so it misses the early window. But it is still here because it is the closest thing left to the original three martini lunch.

This is the space that used to be The Four Seasons. The room is midcentury with dark wood and tableside service. The martinis come freezer cold in crystal decanters, made with a house blend of Plymouth and Tanqueray gins, vermouth, and spring water. They also do variations like the Tuxedo and the Kangaroo if you want vodka.

The signature move is the prime rib carved tableside.

The dress code is real. Three martinis and lunch will cost $250 to $400, and you should book weeks in advance.

The Bar Room at The Modern

9 West 53rd Street at MoMA

The Modern opens at 11:30 AM daily. It is adjacent to the Museum of Modern Art, and the room is casual elegant.

The martini here is made with a gin blend, blanc vermouth, and Alsatian kirsch. It is more composed than a classic martini. The food is seasonal contemporary American. You come here when you want sharp execution without feeling weighed down afterward.

The dress code is business casual. Three martinis and a meal will run $150 to $260.

How to choose

If you need to be in and out by noon because of a flight, go to Del Frisco’s or Le Rock. Both open at 11:00 AM.

If you are based near Penn Station and headed to Newark or JFK, go to The Dynamo Room and order the minis.

If you want the most serious martini program, go to Le Rock.

If you want the full classic experience and cost is not a concern, go to The Grill.

If you want excellent food and drinks in a more contemporary setting, go to The Modern.

A note on booking

Book two to four weeks ahead for weekday lunch slots, especially Tuesday through Thursday. The Grill requires advance reservations. Le Rock and Del Frisco’s fill up quickly at 11:00 AM. The Dynamo Room only does lunch Tuesday through Thursday, so check the schedule.

All of these places operate primarily on weekdays. Confirm hours directly before you go, because seasonal adjustments happen.

What three independent food experts would agree on if they merged their reports into one list of top recommendations.

---

Barbecue

• Cattleack Barbeque (Farmers Branch), Smoked Brisket. All three experts rank this at or near the top. Limited hours, salt-and-pepper rub, post oak smoke.
• Vaqueros Texas Bar-B-Q (Allen), Al Pastor Pork Belly Burnt Ends. Two experts highlight this dish specifically. Smoked pork belly with pineapple and achiote glaze.
• Pecan Lodge (Deep Ellum), Brisket and Sausage Platter. Got fresh attention in 2026 through the American Airlines partnership. The two-meat plate with mac and cheese is the go-to order.
• Hurtado Barbecue (Dallas Farmers Market), “El Jefe” Platter. Brisket, ribs, sausage, and Mexican street corn. Built for sharing.

Tex-Mex and Tacos

• Fito’s (multiple locations), Taco de Trompo. All three experts name this one. Spit-roasted pork on a corn tortilla with onions and cilantro, full meal under $10.
• Herrera’s Oak Cliff, Combo No. 1A. Cheese enchilada, tamale, beef taco, and bean tostada. Straightforward Dallas Tex-Mex.
• Mariano’s Hacienda Ranch (DFW locations), Beef Fajitas. The consensus pick for fajitas, with fresh tortillas.
• Las Palmas Tex-Mex (Uptown), Queso and Cheese Enchiladas. Multiple experts flag the garlic-herb queso as one of the best shareable starters in the city.

Vietnamese

• Ba Lee (Carrollton), Grilled Pork Bánh Mì. All three experts agree on this. In-house processed meats on a crusty baguette, around $6.50.
• Phở Xóm (Carrollton), Phở Tái Lăn. A 14-hour bone broth with wok-fried beef in beef tallow and garlic. Northern Vietnamese preparation that’s hard to find elsewhere.
• Lua Kitchen (Garland), Bún Chả Hà Nội. D Magazine’s 2026 standout for grilled pork and meatball noodles.

American Classics

• Keller’s Drive-In (multiple locations), No. 5 Double-Meat Cheeseburger. Every expert includes it. A 1960s carhop drive-in with poppy-seed bun burgers starting at $4.99.
• Roots Chicken Shak (Plano, Legacy Hall), “The Big Bird” Sandwich. Chef Tiffany Derry’s duck-fat fried chicken sandwich, under $10.
• Aunt Irene’s Kitchen (South Dallas), Fried Fish Sandwich or Black Box Seafood Boil. The $10 fish sandwich works for lunch. The $35 Black Box (crab, shrimp, sausage, corn, potatoes) is the bigger commitment.

I live in the East Village, and I have spent the better part of three years eating dumplings at counter-service spots across New York City. Some of what I write here comes from personal experience. The rest comes from research, reading, and talking to people who eat dumplings more than I do. I will be clear about which is which.

This is not a comprehensive guide. It is a record of five places that show what a dumpling can be when every detail is attended to.

The five spots

1. Shu Jiao Fu Zhou, Chinatown

This is my favorite dumpling spot in New York City. I have eaten here many times, and it is awesome every single time.

They specialize in northern style dumplings with paper thin wrappers that puff when steamed. The pork and chive filling is so well seasoned that you do not need sauce. The dumplings are juicy, almost to the point of being soup dumplings, but they hold their shape.

Six dumplings cost three dollars. You can also buy a bag of fifty frozen dumplings for twelve dollars.

2. White Bear, Flushing

White Bear is a takeout window with a menu of thirty four items taped above the counter. Everyone orders the same thing. Number six. Wontons in chili oil.

The wrappers are thin, almost translucent, with a soft chew that yields immediately. They do not tear. They do not stick to each other.

The filling is pork and vegetables, balanced and juicy. But the chili oil is what really makes White Bear what it is. It is bright, sharp, and layered. The pickled vegetables add crunch and acidity. The scallions add freshness.

I am somewhat sensitive to chili oil, and even I went back.

3. North Dumpling, Lower East Side

Workers fold dumplings at a table in the back. Another worker fries them in batches and delivers them to the front counter, still crackling.

I have had North Dumpling many times, and it is really good. The wrappers are medium thick. They develop a crust on the bottom that shatters when you bite into it. The inside stays chewy. The filling is ginger forward, bold, and porky.

Ten dumplings cost four dollars. The consistency is ironclad. The turnover is so high that every order feels like it just came off the line. I do not think it quite reaches the level of Shu Jiao Fu Zhou, but for the price, it is hard to beat.

4. Vanessa’s Dumpling House, Chinatown

Vanessa’s has been open since 1999. It has multiple locations.

The wrappers are thick, but tender. They hold up to steaming or frying without becoming gummy. The filling is chive heavy, uniformly fresh, and dependable.

It is not quite at the level of the top three spots on this list, but it is still a good option. Consistency across years and locations counts for something.

5. Tasty Dumpling, Chinatown

I have not tried Tasty Dumpling yet, so this ranking is based on research rather than personal experience.

It sits across from Columbus Park on Mulberry Street. The dumplings are reported to be small, ribbed, and darkly flavorful. The wrappers are said to be surprisingly delicate for a spot at this price point.

Four dumplings cost two dollars. The portion is designed for snacking, not for a full meal. Multiple sources note that the dumplings do not travel well. It is on my list to try soon.

A note on other strong contenders

I have not had a chance to try Wei Mei Xian in Sunset Park yet, but I have heard great things. The wrappers are said to be nearly translucent, and their version of xiao long bao reportedly crosses into steamed bun territory.

Jin Mei Dumpling on Henry Street offers fifteen dumplings for five dollars, and it is pretty good if you like volume. The flavor profile is unusual though. The filling tastes almost like ground beef or ground pork mixed with some kind of chili seasoning. If that sounds appealing, it is worth a trip.

I have heard good things about Super Taste on Eldridge Street as well, but I have not had a chance to try it yet. They are known for deep fried dumplings with aged black vinegar.

Same goes for Fried Dumpling on Mosco Street. I have heard it is a historic spot and still satisfying, but I have not been able to get there yet.

If you live in New York City and rely on the OvRride bus to get to the mountains, you know the struggle. You want fresh snow, wide trails to practice your carving, and a stress-free day. But the 2025-2026 season has been wild. We have seen everything from freezing cold snaps to unseasonably warm spells. Plus, with big companies buying up local resorts, the crowds have changed.

For an intermediate rider (someone who can link turns but isn’t ready for steep ice) picking the wrong mountain can ruin your day. We analyzed the top bus destinations to rank them based on what actually matters to you. We looked at snow quality, crowd levels, and whether the travel time is worth it.

Here is the definitive, ranked guide for the NYC intermediate snowboarder.

---

How We Ranked These Mountains

We ignored the marketing hype and focused on the reality of a day trip from Union Square. Here is our criteria:

• Uncrowded Trails: You need space to turn without fear of collisions.
• Snow Quality: We prioritize soft snow over ice because it is safer for learning.
• Intermediate Terrain: We looked for “carving blues” which are wide, consistent trails that aren’t too steep.
• The Commute: We weighed the total time of the trip against the quality of the experience.

Note: This guide is optimized for weekday trips. Weekends in the Northeast are almost always crowded regardless of where you go.

---

1. The Winner: Belleayre Mountain (Highmount, NY)

The “Hidden” Gem of the Catskills

For the 2026 season, Belleayre Mountain is the clear winner. Unlike the corporate resorts nearby, Belleayre is state-run and feels more like a park than a business. It is relaxed, friendly, and focused entirely on the riding experience.

Why It Wins on Snow

Belleayre sits in a unique spot that often gets the “Catskill Cloud” effect. This means it frequently gets more natural snow than neighboring mountains. It also has a high ridge that protects the trails from the wind. This keeps the snow soft rather than stripping it down to the icy base.

The Best Trails for Carving

The layout is perfect for learning. The upper mountain features wide, rolling blue trails that don’t get too steep suddenly. The standout run is Dot Nebel. It is incredibly wide and allows you to lock in big, sweeping turns. Another favorite, Deer Run, offers a long, peaceful cruise. You rarely find dangerous intersections here.

The Trade-Off

The only downside is the distance. It is about 135 miles from NYC. The bus ride usually takes around 3 hours each way. However, the superior snow and lack of crowds make the travel time a smart investment.

Verdict: The best experience available. The extra travel time pays off with better snow and empty trails. Aim for a Wednesday trip for a private mountain feel.

---

2. The Runner-Up: Hunter Mountain (Hunter, NY)

The Industrial Snow Giant

Hunter Mountain is the heavyweight of the region. It is famous for its snowmaking power. If nature doesn’t provide snow, Hunter’s massive automated system will cover the mountain in hours. It has fast lifts and a big lodge, but it comes with a chaotic atmosphere.

The “Hunter North” Strategy

If you go to Hunter, you must be strategic. Stick to the Hunter North expansion. This area is newer and served by a high-speed 6-person lift. The trails are wide, straight, and usually much less crowded than the main face of the mountain.

The Warning

Avoid the main summit trails like the Belt Parkway if you can. It is a famous intermediate run, but it gets so much traffic that it often gets scraped down to ice by midday. It can feel like a highway during rush hour.

Verdict: A strong backup option with great lifts. Stick to the Northern side to avoid the ice and crowds.

---

3. The Vertical Challenger: Blue Mountain (Palmerton, PA)

Big Vertical, Long Day

Blue Mountain offers the highest vertical drop in Pennsylvania. This means you get long, sustained runs that let you get into a good rhythm. Trails like Razor’s Edge are excellent for practicing technique on a consistent slope.

The Logistics Problem

The issue here is the commute. While it looks close on a map, the bus route through New Jersey and Pennsylvania traffic is brutal. A typical day trip can last 13 to 14 hours from departure to return. That is a lot of time on a bus for Pennsylvania conditions.

Verdict: Great terrain with long runs, but the 14-hour travel day makes it a tough sell compared to the Catskills.

---

4. The Sleep-In Option: Camelback Mountain (Tannersville, PA)

The Midday Advantage

Camelback has one unique feature which is the schedule. You can catch a “Midday” bus that leaves Union Square at 10:30 AM. If you hate waking up at 5:00 AM, this is your only real option.

The Reality Check

Because you arrive late, you ride late. Camelback has night lighting, but riding at night often means riding on hard surfaces as the temperature drops. The resort is also very commercial and attached to a massive waterpark. Expect loud crowds and a busy base area. The snow on the main trail, Nile Mile, is deep but often gets pushed into piles of sugar and ice.

Verdict: Choose this only if you need to sleep in. It is a lifestyle choice rather than a performance choice.

---

5. The “Gym” Option: Mountain Creek (Vernon, NJ)

So Close, Yet So Icy

Mountain Creek is the closest option at just 47 miles away. It serves as a local gym for riders who just need a quick fix. However, its low elevation means it struggles with the weather.

Why It Ranks Last

The snow here often melts during the day and freezes at night. This creates “boilerplate” ice that is unforgiving for snowboarders. The main intermediate trail, Horizon, acts as a funnel for the whole mountain. It is often packed with people which makes it a stressful obstacle course rather than a fun run.

Verdict: Only go here if you absolutely cannot spare the time for a longer trip. It is convenient, but the ice and crowds are difficult for learners.

---

Summary Comparison

Resort	Uncrowded Score	Snow Quality	Travel Ease	Best For
1. Belleayre	10/10	9/10	6/10	Best Overall
2. Hunter	8/10	7/10	6/10	Fast Lifts
3. Blue Mtn	7/10	6/10	6/10	Long Runs
4. Camelback	5/10	5/10	8/10	Sleeping In
5. Mtn Creek	4/10	3/10	10/10	Short Trip

---

Final Tips for Your Trip

• Watch Out for Plattekill: You might hear about a cool indie mountain called Plattekill. It is awesome, but it is usually closed Monday through Thursday. Don’t book a weekday trip there without checking the schedule.
• Bring Low-Light Goggles: The light in the Northeast is often flat and gray. Yellow or pink lenses will help you see the ice patches before you hit them.
• Hydrate: The bus ride is long and dry. Drink plenty of water to avoid leg cramps on the ride home.

I read When Things Fall Apart during one of the hardest stretches of my life. I lost something that felt extremely important to me, and then not long after, I lost something much, much more important. I needed something that could hold the weight of that without turning away.

It did not fix me or offer a roadmap to get past what I was feeling. Instead, it taught me how to be with what was happening, and that changed everything.

When I was in the middle of my losses, I kept trying to think my way out. I kept looking ahead to some future moment when I would feel better, when I would have processed everything. What Chödrön helped me see is that my impulse to escape the present moment was itself a form of suffering. I could see how much energy I was putting into making everything make sense, into finding a reason for what had happened, into creating a narrative that would let me feel okay again.

The book invited me to stop doing that—to let the ground be groundless, and to let the story stay messy and incomplete.

That said, not everything resonated. The sections on compassion felt less urgent to me than the core teaching about “being with what is.” I also found the references to her teachers and mentors extraneous; they often pulled me out of the teaching and into someone else’s biography. There were moments where the framework felt like it was asking for something I wasn’t ready to give.

But I am grateful it was recommended it to me. It gave me permission to stop trying to fix myself and start being with myself instead.

Get more of my book recommendations here.

Late Thursday night, hunger hit hard, and I finally gave in to weeks of curiosity about Báhn Anh Em, a Vietnamese sandwich spot I’d been eyeing for a while.

The verdict: Must go. This is the best bahn mi bread I’ve ever had, and I’m absolutely coming back for more.

Why This Bahn Mi Stands Out

Here’s what made this sandwich exceptional:

• The bread is revolutionary. It’s significantly lighter than typical bahn mi baguettes, with an airy interior and just the right amount of crust.
• Generous meat portions. They don’t skimp on the pate, pork floss, head cheese, or any of the traditional bahn mi proteins.
• Textural complexity. Crispy vegetables, soft rice noodles (which create an interesting rubber band effect on biting), and multiple protein textures all work together.
• Flavor layering. Lemongrass, Thai basil, slightly sweet house mayo, acidic pickled vegetables, and rich meats create a balanced bite.
• The takeout hack works. The place is packed to the entry door like sardines, but ordering takeout lets you skip the wait and just grab your food.

One friction point: Good luck getting a table.

The Bread Changes Everything

Most bahn mi bread is dense and chewy. It serves as a vehicle for the fillings, but it can also overpower them. The house-baked baguette here flips this dynamic completely.

The bread is light and airy on the inside with a delicate crust on the outside. It’s sturdy enough to hold all the fillings without falling apart, but it doesn’t dominate the bite. This lighter approach lets every ingredient shine. I can actually taste the lemongrass, pick up the sweetness in the mayo, and appreciate the freshness of the Thai basil and cilantro without fighting through a thick bread barrier.

I’ve had plenty of bahn mi sandwiches over the years, and the bread has always been good but never remarkable. This is the first time the bread itself has been the standout component of the sandwich.

What’s Inside the Sandwich

Báhn Anh Em loads their bahn mi with traditional ingredients, and they don’t hold back on portions:

• Pork floss in generous amounts
• Pate that comes through in almost every bite
• Head cheese and other classic bahn mi meats
• Rice noodles in lighter amounts, creating an interesting textural element
• House mayo applied perfectly (not too much, not too little, with a subtle sweetness)
• Shredded carrots and julienned cucumbers for acidity and crunch
• Thai basil and cilantro for freshness
• Lemongrass adding aromatic complexity

The rice noodles are an unexpected addition that I haven’t seen in most bahn mi sandwiches. They add a unique element: when you bite down, they stretch and pull, creating a rubber band effect that adds to the overall textural experience. It’s unusual but it works.

The Flavor Balance

What makes this sandwich work is how well everything balances. You get the acidic bite from the pickled vegetables, a touch of sweetness from the mayo, rich fattiness from the pate and meats, and bright freshness from the herbs. Every component has a role, and nothing overpowers anything else.

The fat from the meats and pate cuts through the acidity of the vegetables. The herbs provide freshness that keeps the sandwich from feeling heavy despite all the rich ingredients. The light baguette ties it all together without adding unnecessary weight.

That balance seems simple but requires attention to proportions. Too much mayo and it becomes greasy. Too many pickled vegetables and it’s too sharp. Too much bread and the whole thing becomes stodgy. They get the ratios right.

The Takeout Strategy

The restaurant is absolutely packed. It looks like chaos from the outside.

Order takeout. You walk in, grab your sandwich from the counter, and you’re out in under a minute.

It worked perfectly for a late Thursday night when I just wanted to eat good food without dealing with crowds.

When Bread is So Good It Makes You Stop Mid-Bite

The first bite delivered immediate satisfaction. I immediately stopped moving for a second to focus on what I’m tasting. The bread was softer than I expected, almost pillowy. The flavors came in waves: herbs first, then the richness of the pate, then the bright acidity of the pickled vegetables cutting through.

Not life-changing, but genuinely excellent in a way that made me wish I’d tried this place sooner. The sandwich reset my baseline for what a bahn mi should taste like.

I’m already thinking about when I’ll go back.

I want to talk about skunk cabbage.

This sounds like the kind of sentence that usually precedes a digression, an apology, or a footnote explaining that skunk cabbage is a metaphor for something else. It is not. I literally want to talk about skunk cabbage. Specifically, the skunk cabbage that grew in the woods behind my childhood house in Finksburg, Maryland, and nowhere else in the world that I have ever been.

This is strange, because I have been to a lot of places. My brother and I hiked the entire Appalachian Trail together. Two thousand miles of ridgelines, valleys, shelters, rhododendron tunnels, bog bridges, alpine meadows, and wet forests. If skunk cabbage were a normal plant, we would have seen it again. If it were even a slightly common plant, it would have shown up at least once. It never did.

Which means that for my brain, skunk cabbage is not a plant. It is a location.

The plant that taught me what resistance smells like

If you have never seen skunk cabbage in the wild, here is the important part. It does not look like a plant that belongs here.

It looks like something that crash landed.

In early spring it comes up as a purple hood sticking out of black mud, like a prop from a low budget science fiction movie. Later it turns into enormous, glossy green leaves that feel less like vegetation and more like a failed attempt at biological armor. If you step on it, it releases a smell that your brain immediately classifies as a warning. Not rotten. Not floral. Just wrong.

As kids, we did not know any of this intellectually. We knew it tactically.

The wetland behind our house was small. Not a swamp you would mark on a map. Just a low, muddy area fed by groundwater that stayed wet even in summer. You could not walk through it unless you cleared a path, and clearing a path meant knocking down skunk cabbage. There was no stepping delicately around it. It grew in dense, hostile clusters. Progress required violence.

So we learned that skunk cabbage was tough, territorial, and smelled like punishment.

This gave it personality.

Why this thing existed only behind our house

Finksburg is not wilderness. It is rural in the sense that there are trees and lawns and people who own riding mowers. Most kids I knew did not have wetlands behind their houses. They had woods that were dry enough to run through without thinking.

Our woods were different. They squelched. They sucked at your boots. They required trail maintenance.

This matters, because skunk cabbage does not grow in all wetlands. It grows in very specific ones. Groundwater fed, wooded, permanently mucky, stable over decades. The kind of place that never quite dries out and never quite freezes solid. These places are rare, and they are often small. According to ecological surveys, skunk cabbage colonies persist for decades or longer because their underground structures are massive and slow growing, essentially anchoring them to a specific hydrological niche.

As a child, you do not experience this as niche ecology. You experience it as ownership.

This was our plant. Our smell. Our monster.

An exhaustive field study of everywhere it was not

One of the quiet shocks of hiking the Appalachian Trail was discovering how generic most forests are.

This is not an insult. Forests are wonderful. But after a few hundred miles, you start to notice how often the same patterns repeat. Oak hickory slopes. Fern covered understories. Mud that looks like other mud.

And there was never skunk cabbage.

Not in Pennsylvania. Not in Vermont. Not in the Smokies. Not even in the cold seepage areas where, on paper, it could have existed. Every time we crossed a wet area, some part of my brain expected it. Like waiting to see an old friend in a crowd. It never happened.

This is how a childhood detail turns into a symbol. Not because it is profound, but because it refuses to generalize.

Why nostalgia works better when it refuses to generalize

Nostalgia usually works by abstraction. You remember summer. You remember bikes. You remember the feeling of being bored in a way that felt infinite.

Skunk cabbage does the opposite. It refuses abstraction.

You cannot remember skunk cabbage without remembering that exact patch of woods. The angle of the trees. The way the mud swallowed sticks. The fort we half built and abandoned. The path we cleared and recleared because plants do not respect childhood infrastructure.

It is not a memory you can export.

There is no skunk cabbage in my adult life, and that is the point. It anchors a version of me that cannot be recreated by visiting similar places. The plant is too specific. The wetland is too small. The conditions too exact.

What childhood wonder looks like in retrospect

I think part of what we mean by childhood wonder is not that the world was bigger, but that it was more uneven.

Certain things mattered enormously because they were rare and local and demanded interaction. You could not just observe skunk cabbage. You had to deal with it. It pushed back. It smelled. It forced decisions.

As an adult, I see skunk cabbage described as a thermogenic wetland plant with ancient evolutionary origins, a keystone species in certain seepage ecosystems. This is all true. It is also irrelevant to why it matters to me.

What matters is that it only existed there.

That the world once had corners that were not interchangeable.

That somewhere behind a house in Maryland, a weird plant grew in a weird patch of mud, and my brain decided, very early on, that this was what reality looked like up close.

I want to tell a story about analytic philosophy over the last ten years. It is not a clean story, and it does not end with a moral, but it does have a recognizable arc. If you had asked me in, say, 2005 what analytic philosophy was about, I probably would have said something like “language, logic, and modality.” If you asked me the same question in 2025, I would say “structure.”

By structure, I mean something like this. Instead of asking what words mean, or what is possible in other worlds, philosophers have become increasingly obsessed with the architecture of reality itself. What is fundamental. What depends on what. Whether the world has sharp edges or blurry ones. How social facts latch onto physical facts. How norms attach to nature. What kinds of explanations bottom out and which ones keep going.

This is not a return to old fashioned metaphysics exactly. It is more like a retooling. The new metaphysician is not cataloging entities so much as mapping dependency relations. The new epistemologist is not just asking whether a belief counts as knowledge but how inquiry should proceed under uncertainty and social constraint. The new ethicist is not just asking what is right but how to act when unsure what right even means.

I am going to call this cluster of moves the structural turn. I am not claiming everyone signed a manifesto. I am claiming that if you skim the major journals from 2015 to 2025, this is the shape that emerges whether anyone intended it or not.

What follows is a guided tour of the major open problems across five domains: metaphysics, philosophy of mind, epistemology, philosophy of language and logic, and metaethics and normative theory. I am not trying to solve these problems. I am trying to show why they stubbornly refuse to go away.

---

1. Metaphysics, or: What Depends on What and Why That Might Not Be Well Defined

1.1 Grounding and the Dream of a Single “In Virtue Of”

If you want one concept that captures the metaphysical mood of the decade, it is grounding. Grounding is supposed to be the non causal relation that explains why some facts obtain in virtue of others. The statue exists in virtue of the clay. The mental exists in virtue of the physical. The moral exists in virtue of the natural. And so on.

At first glance, this looks like a godsend. We get to talk about metaphysical explanation without pretending it is causation. We get hierarchy without time. We get dependence without dynamism.

The big question is whether grounding is one thing.

Jonathan Schaffer and Kit Fine think it is. On their view, grounding is a primitive relation that structures reality into levels. Fundamental facts ground derivative facts. The job of metaphysics is to identify the base and describe how everything else flows from it.

Schaffer even gives us formal tools for this. He adapts structural equation modeling from causal inference and uses it to model metaphysical dependence. The idea is roughly this: just as causal equations tell us how changing one variable would change another over time, grounding equations tell us how changing the grounds would change the grounded. This lets us make sense of metaphysical counterfactuals like “if the physical facts had been different, the mental facts would have been different.”

This picture is elegant. It also makes metaphysics feel like a serious theoretical science.

Jessica Wilson thinks this picture is misleading. On her view, capital G Grounding is not doing real work. What does the work are many different small g relations: realization, constitution, determinable to determinate, type identity, and so on. When we say “the mental is grounded in the physical,” what we really mean is something more specific like “the mental is realized by the physical.” Lumping all of these together under one label hides the machinery.

This is sometimes called the coarseness problem. Saying “A grounds B” often tells you less than saying exactly how A relates to B. Unitary grounding theorists reply that this is fine. “Cause” is also coarse, and we still think it is a real relation with many species. Kicking and pushing are different, but they are both causal. Likewise, realization and constitution might be species of grounding.

Things get even messier when we look at the logic of grounding. If grounding is one relation, it should probably be irreflexive, asymmetric, and transitive. Nothing grounds itself. If A grounds B, B does not ground A. If A grounds B and B grounds C, then A grounds C.

Each of these principles has been challenged. There are plausible cases where transitivity seems to fail, especially once we allow contrastive explanation. There are proposals involving metaphysical loops, where entities mutually ground one another. At that point, the nice hierarchical picture starts to wobble.

Why does any of this matter? Because grounding is doing enormous work across philosophy. Physicalism is often stated as a grounding thesis. So is moral naturalism. If grounding turns out to be disunified or incoherent, then “naturalism” might mean very different things in different domains, and metaphysics loses its unifying backbone.

1.2 Vagueness in the World Itself

For a long time, analytic philosophers were pretty confident that vagueness lived in language, not in reality. Mountains do not have vague boundaries. Words do. The world itself is perfectly precise. We just talk about it sloppily.

This view was supported by a famous argument from Gareth Evans against vague identity. If a is vaguely identical to b, then b has the property of being vaguely identical to a, which a lacks. By Leibniz’s Law, they are not identical. So vague identity is impossible.

Over the last decade, this consensus has cracked.

Elizabeth Barnes and J.R.G. Williams argue that Evans’ argument assumes what is at issue. It assumes that vagueness must be modeled as a property of relations. They propose instead that the world itself might be unsettled. On their view, reality corresponds not to one perfectly precise world but to a range of precise “ersatz” worlds. A proposition is metaphysically indeterminate if it is true in some of these worlds and false in others, and reality has not settled which one is actual.

Jessica Wilson proposes a different model. She suggests that indeterminacy can arise when an object instantiates a determinable property without instantiating any single determinate. The particle has a position determinable but no precise position determinate. This is not semantic vagueness and not mere ignorance. It is a specific way of being.

Quantum mechanics looms large here. Superposition looks a lot like metaphysical indeterminacy. Treating the wavefunction as representing genuine indeterminacy may be more parsimonious than adding hidden variables or branching worlds. Some have even suggested that Everettian many worlds is just metaphysical indeterminacy in disguise.

If the world is vague, what logic applies to it? Does classical logic still hold, or do we need truth value gaps or gluts? What about the open future? Is “there will be a sea battle tomorrow” already true or false? Or is reality genuinely unsettled?

What once looked like a technical issue about borderline cases has turned into a fundamental question about the shape of reality.

1.3 Social Reality and the Trouble with Construction

Social ontology has become unavoidable. Race, gender, money, institutions, and social roles all have real causal power. At the same time, they are clearly not fundamental in the way quarks are.

Sally Haslanger’s work reframed the debate by introducing ameliorative analysis. Instead of asking what our concept of race is, or what race really is, she asks what the concept should be for legitimate purposes. Her answer defines race and gender in terms of social hierarchy and oppression.

This creates a dilemma. If race is socially constructed and biologically unreal, should we eliminate it? But if we eliminate it, how do we track injustice? Haslanger resolves this by being a realist about social kinds. Race is real as a social structure, even if it is not a biological one.

Critics have raised worries about inclusion, especially regarding trans identities. If womanhood is defined by subordination on the basis of observed sex, what about trans women who have not been subordinated in that way? Or trans men who have?

This has pushed some philosophers toward conferralism. On this view, social properties are conferred in context by social recognition. You are a woman in a context if you are treated as one by those with standing. This shifts focus from static structure to dynamic interaction.

Race debates have similarly splintered. Some defend social realism. Others argue for a revised biological realism based on population genetics. Others are eliminativists. Still others treat race as primarily political and historical.

A lurking question is whether there can be a unified theory of social kinds at all. Money, gender, and race might all be constructed, but they might be constructed in importantly different ways. Pluralism may be unavoidable.

---

2. Philosophy of Mind, or: Explaining Why Consciousness Feels Like a Problem

2.1 The Meta Problem of Consciousness

The hard problem of consciousness asks how physical processes give rise to subjective experience. The meta problem asks why we think there is a hard problem.

David Chalmers frames the meta problem as explaining our problem intuitions. Why do we say things like “there is something it is like” or “no physical explanation seems sufficient”? This is an “easy” problem in the technical sense. It concerns behavior and judgments.

Illusionists like Keith Frankish and Daniel Dennett argue that solving the meta problem is enough. If we can explain why brains generate reports about ineffable qualia, there is nothing left to explain. Consciousness, as ordinarily conceived, is a user illusion.

Realists reply that this misses the residue. Even if we fully explain why a system claims to have experiences, the question remains whether it actually has them. If introspection reveals the essence of experience, physicalism is in trouble. If introspection is systematically misleading, illusionists owe us a story about how a physical process produces the appearance of non physical properties.

This debate increasingly intersects with epistemology. If our beliefs about consciousness are shaped by evolutionary and cognitive biases, should we trust them? This mirrors evolutionary debunking arguments in ethics.

2.2 Predictive Processing and Representation Anxiety

Predictive processing has become the dominant framework in cognitive science. The brain is modeled as a prediction error minimizer. It maintains a generative model of the world and updates it to reduce surprise.

The philosophical fight is over representation. Andy Clark argues that predictive processing vindicates representationalism. The generative models function as maps. The brain builds representations because they are useful.

Others argue that this is a category mistake. The models are mathematical descriptions of system dynamics, not internal symbols with semantic content. The brain is regulating itself, not representing the world.

The dark room problem sharpens the issue. If the brain wants to minimize prediction error, why not sit in a dark, silent room? The standard reply appeals to higher level expectations about action. We predict that we will explore. But this collapses desire into prediction. Wanting becomes expecting.

Is that right? Does it capture the phenomenology of desire? Or are we losing something important?

Some propose structural representation as a compromise. A state counts as a representation if it stands in a structural homomorphism with its target and is used for control. The open question is whether predictive processing models meet this criterion or whether they are just control loops all the way down.

---

3. Epistemology, or: How to Reason While Being Human

3.1 Inquiry Versus Belief

Traditional epistemology focuses on belief states. Zetetic epistemology focuses on inquiry.

Jane Friedman points out a tension. Evidentialism says you should believe what your evidence supports. Zetetic norms say you should take the means necessary to answer your question.

Suppose your evidence supports a belief to a high degree, but you could easily gather more evidence. Should you believe now or suspend judgment and keep investigating? Being a good believer and being a good inquirer can pull apart.

Some respond by making epistemic norms instrumental. Beliefs are tools for inquiry. Others argue that belief is just a stopping point of inquiry, and inquiry norms are primary. Others try to dissolve the tension by separating norms governing states from norms governing actions.

The deeper question is whether rationality is static or dynamic. Is it about matching mind to world at a time, or about improving that match over time?

3.2 Higher Order Evidence and Rational Akrasia

Higher order evidence is evidence about your own reliability.

The hypoxia case is standard. A pilot calculates that she has enough fuel. Then she learns she is cognitively impaired. Should she trust the calculation?

Conciliationists say higher order evidence defeats first order justification. Your confidence in the belief should match your confidence in your reliability.

Level splitters disagree. Maria Lasonen Aarnio argues that you can be justified in believing P and justified in believing that your belief in P is unreliable. Rationality is about responding to reasons, not about internal coherence. The result is epistemic akrasia: believing P while believing you should not believe P.

This is uncomfortable, but maybe reality is uncomfortable. The debate pits internalist coherence against externalist truth tracking.

3.3 Epistemic Injustice Grows Teeth

Fricker’s original framework focused on credibility deficits and hermeneutical gaps. More recent work emphasizes agency and power.

Contributory injustice occurs when marginalized groups have the concepts to understand their experience, but dominant groups refuse to uptake them. This is not absence. It is active blockage.

Epistemic exploitation highlights the wrong of demanding that marginalized people do the labor of educating others about oppression. A request for evidence can be virtuous inquiry or vicious exploitation depending on context.

This forces epistemology to confront its own norms. Asking for reasons is not always innocent.

---

4. Language and Logic, or: Fixing Our Tools While Standing on Them

4.1 Conceptual Engineering and the Implementation Problem

Conceptual engineering aims to improve our concepts, not just analyze them.

The implementation problem asks how this is supposed to work. If meanings are fixed by social usage, how can philosophers change them from the armchair?

If redefining “woman” does not change public meaning, engineering is toothless. If it does change meaning, we need a story about metasemantic control.

Some appeal to speaker meaning and gradual uptake. Others argue that we cannot control meaning directly and must engage in conceptual activism, hoping the metasemantics follow.

There is also the problem of topic continuity. If we change the meaning of “freedom” to make it compatible with determinism, are we still talking about freedom, or have we changed the subject? Solving a problem by changing topics is not obviously progress.

4.2 Logical Pluralism and the Fear of Collapse

Logical pluralists argue that there is more than one correct logic. Validity is truth preservation across cases, and different notions of case yield different logics.

Williamson argues for monism and anti exceptionalism. Logic is a scientific theory of the most general structure of reality. We should choose the one best supported by abductive fit.

Pluralism faces the collapse problem. If one logic says you must believe P and another says you may refrain, normativity seems to side with the stronger logic. Pluralism collapses into monism in practice.

Some propose domain specific logics. Quantum theory might need one logic. Database theory another. There may be no single global logic.

4.3 Slurs and the Semantics of Offense

Slurs test the boundary between semantics and pragmatics.

Pure expressivism says slurs just express contempt. Hybrid views add descriptive content plus derogatory force.

Appropriation creates trouble. When members of a target group reclaim a slur, the valence flips.

Prohibitionist views explain this by taboo violation. Echoic accounts explain it by ironic quotation. A remaining puzzle is subject dependent semantics: how a word’s meaning changes based on who says it.

---

5. Ethics, or: What to Do When Everything Is Uncertain

5.1 Moral Uncertainty

Normative uncertainty asks how to act when unsure which moral theory is correct.

Maximizing expected choice worthiness treats moral theories like hypotheses and weights them by credence. The problem is intertheoretic comparison. How do you compare utility to duty?

Variance normalization tries to fix this by equalizing influence. Critics say this is arbitrary. Others give up and act on their favorite theory.

The deeper issue is whether moral theories share a common scale at all.

5.2 Population Ethics and Impossibility

The repugnant conclusion says that a huge population with barely good lives can be better than a smaller population with excellent lives.

Arrhenius shows that you cannot avoid this while satisfying a few plausible axioms. Something has to give.

Responses include abandoning transitivity, embracing skepticism about large numbers, or biting the bullet and accepting the conclusion.

No option is comfortable.

5.3 Evolutionary Debunking

If evolution shaped our moral beliefs for fitness, not truth, why trust them?

Realists appeal to third factors. Critics say this begs the question. Others argue debunking spreads too far. Math and logic were also selected for usefulness.

Vavova argues that debunking only works if we assume massive error. We can correct for bias using our existing beliefs.

5.4 Transformative Experience

Some choices change who you are. You cannot know their value in advance because you cannot know what it is like, and because the evaluator changes.

Decision theory breaks. Testimony does not solve the problem. Some suggest we choose for discovery, not utility.

This threatens the rational agent model itself.

---

6. AI Alignment, or: When Philosophy Stops Being Optional

AI alignment forces all of these issues into practice.

If intelligence and goals are orthogonal, value loading is hard. Inverse reinforcement learning tries to infer values from behavior. But behavior is messy.

Should AI follow revealed preferences or idealized ones? What counts as idealization? This is moral philosophy in code.

Constitutional AI makes the problem explicit. We are writing a constitution for a non human agent. Every unresolved normative question matters.

If AI systems appear conscious, the other minds problem becomes urgent. If consciousness is an illusion, what does that imply for artificial agents?

---

Summary Table

Domain	Core question	Technical pivot	Key debate
Metaphysics	Grounding unity	Structural equation modeling	Unitary realism vs pluralism
Metaphysics	Worldly indeterminacy	Precisificational models	Semantic vs metaphysical vagueness
Mind	Meta problem	Problem intuitions	Realism vs illusionism
Mind	Predictive processing	Free energy principle	Representation vs enactivism
Epistemology	Inquiry norms	Instrumental principles	Evidentialism vs zeteticism
Epistemology	Higher order evidence	Level splitting	Conciliation vs right reasons
Logic	Logical choice	Anti exceptionalism	Monism vs pluralism
Ethics	Moral uncertainty	Variance normalization	MEC vs incomparability
Ethics	Population ethics	Impossibility theorems	Totalism vs impossibility acceptance

Back to top

My brother is working on test data scraping for New England fisheries. I’m watching from the sidelines, and what I’ve discovered has completely changed how I see the commercial fishing industry. The verdict: The small-boat fishing industry is fundamentally broken, crushed by data asymmetry that’s forcing family-owned vessels out of business while industrial fleets dominate. But the research I’ve uncovered is also thrilling because it reveals domain-specific knowledge you simply can’t find anywhere else without doing the hard work of talking to fishermen, reading regulatory testimony, and digging through auction data.

What started as curiosity about my brother’s project turned into a deep dive that exposed something darker: small fishing boats in New England are dying not because of bad seamanship or declining fish stocks, but because they don’t have access to the right information at the right time. And that information gap is widening every year.

The Data Wall That’s Sinking Small Boats

The commercial fishing landscape in New England has transformed from a “hunting” industry into a data-managed resource sector. For family-owned vessels under fifty feet, the traditional measures of success no longer matter. Physical prowess, mechanical reliability, decades of experience: none of it counts if you don’t have high-velocity, localized data.

The problem is straightforward and brutal. Industrial-scale fleets have extensive administrative support to navigate complex catch-share systems and quota markets. Small outfits rely on anecdotal reports or delayed scientific assessments that don’t reflect real-time conditions on the water. This isn’t just a competitive disadvantage. It’s a systemic barrier that’s accelerating fleet consolidation into major ports like New Bedford and Gloucester, while traditional landing sites in eastern Maine and Rhode Island wither.

The core issue: Data has become the primary currency of maritime operations, and small boats can’t afford to buy in.

One Hundred Pain Points That Define the Crisis

The research I found breaks down into one hundred distinct operational, regulatory, and economic friction points. These aren’t abstract policy concerns. They’re daily problems that determine whether a fishing trip makes money or loses it.

Environmental Blindness Is Costing Boats Money

Small-boat operators need granular, site-specific data to anticipate environmental shifts before they manifest as regulatory closures or gear failures. The Gulf of Maine is changing at a rate that exceeds traditional triennial surveys. Fishermen are seeing it happen in real time, but the data systems lag years behind.

Here’s what they actually need:

• Weekly Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning forecasts for specific harvest sites, not regional averages that arrive too late to prevent closures
• Real-time subsurface temperature data at specific gear depths to track the movement of black sea bass and Atlantic cod, which are shifting north faster than quota systems can adapt
• Harmful Algal Bloom trajectory modeling that gives advance warning of rapid harvesting closures instead of emergency alerts after the damage is done
• River herring avoidance map updates to prevent midwater trawl bycatch that triggers slippage penalties and early season closures
• Whale migration and acoustic detection alerts for compliance with seasonal speed and gear restrictions that can shut down entire fishing areas

The biological baseline is shifting. Black sea bass are expanding north into Southern New England waters where vessels encounter high volumes of fish but lack sufficient quota, leading to massive discard problems. If real-time range data were integrated into management models, boats could adjust. Instead, they’re fishing blind and getting penalized for it.

Market Opacity Is Stealing Revenue

Small-boat operators are price-takers in a market where information is siloed within vertically integrated firms or opaque auction houses. The “derived demand” from retail markets in Boston and New York doesn’t communicate efficiently to the port level, causing significant revenue loss.

The price spread between size grades is often more dramatic than species-level fluctuation. U-10 scallops command a premium of over fifteen dollars per pound compared to 30-40 count scallops. A small boat focusing on quality over quantity and landing high-count, hand-handled product can theoretically out-earn a larger vessel. But only if they know in real time which auction is currently paying that premium.

Current market failures:

• No live price feeds from major display auctions in New Bedford and Gloucester, forcing captains to guess where to land their catch
• Opaque quota lease pricing within sectors, with trades facilitated by sector managers without public price reporting
• No visibility into daily landing volumes at local ports, leading to market gluts that depress prices for everyone who shows up that day
• Vertical integration that eliminates independent buyer competition at certain ports, giving captains no negotiating leverage
• Global aquaculture price pressure from salmon and shrimp that undercuts wild-caught pricing, but with no advance warning of market shifts

Quota markets are particularly broken. Trades happen without public price reporting, creating “informational disconnects” between the managerial class and rank-and-file fishers. Small outfits lack the scale to absorb these inefficiencies.

Amendment 23 Is an Existential Threat

The introduction of Amendment 23 and the push toward 100 percent monitoring coverage represents the most significant regulatory hurdle for small-boat owners in decades. The shift toward industry-funded monitoring places a direct financial tax on every trip that often exceeds the profit margin.

The math is brutal: Human at-sea monitors cost between seven hundred and twelve hundred dollars per vessel per day. For a small vessel landing three thousand dollars worth of fish in a trip, a twelve-hundred-dollar monitor fee represents a forty percent tax on gross revenue. Electronic monitoring hardware costs between thirty-five hundred and five thousand dollars upfront, plus ongoing maintenance and data review fees that can reach forty-eight hundred dollars annually.

The regulatory burden includes:

• Daily availability tracking for at-sea monitors and observers, with trip cancellations when observer shortage hits
• Redundant logbook reporting that owner-operators must complete after exhausting shifts at sea
• Slippage reporting requirements for discards that can trigger violations during at-sea sampling
• Real-time tracking of Acceptable Biological Catch caps to avoid sudden fishery closures mid-trip
• Ropeless gear technology mandates that require expensive on-demand systems with uncertain reliability data

The narrative surrounding Amendment 23 reveals an industry in crisis. The requirement for one hundred percent monitoring for groundfish trips is viewed as an existential threat. A platform providing real-time updates on monitoring waivers or current Electronic Monitoring system prices would serve as a critical financial tool for vessels struggling to stay afloat.

The Statistical Reality of Consolidation

The quantitative data from New England fisheries shows a sector under extreme pressure. The number of boats landing groundfish in Maine has plummeted by forty percent in recent years, while New England as a whole has seen a twenty-six percent decline in active groundfish vessels.

Large vessels over seventy-five feet have seen revenue increase significantly, concentrating operations in Gloucester and New Bedford. Medium vessels in the fifty to seventy-five foot range are up about five percent on average, consolidating in Massachusetts hubs. Small vessels under fifty feet? Revenue is down significantly, with a forty percent reduction in active permits.

This consolidation is driven by sector allocations. Small boats with low catch history find it more profitable to lease their quota to larger vessels than to fish it themselves. This creates a welfare program for inactive permit holders while stripping the working waterfront of active vessels.

Auction Price Data Reveals the Opportunity Cost

Daily price reports from New Bedford and Gloucester auctions show massive volatility across different size grades of the same species. When I looked at actual auction data, the spreads were shocking:

• Scallops ranging from eleven dollars per pound for 30-40 count Closed Area I product to twenty-eight dollars per pound for U-10 Channel scallops
• Market cod at two dollars and sixty cents per pound while halibut fetches six dollars and fifty-three cents
• Large monkfish tails at two dollars per pound, with premium pricing available for smaller, higher-quality cuts

Without real-time access to this pricing data, small boats are making million-dollar decisions based on outdated information or rumors from other captains.

The Technology Gap Is About Last-Mile Delivery

The technical challenge isn’t a lack of data. NERACOOS ocean observing buoys send hourly updates on over fifty variables, including wave frequency and subsurface temperature. Federal Register updates track regulatory changes daily. Auction houses process thousands of pounds of seafood with documented pricing.

The gap is one of responsiveness. Small boats need a system that can take a hundred-million-observation dataset like NERACOOS and distill it into a moment’s notice weather alert tailored for a forty-foot dragger. The current infrastructure is robust in data volume but completely lacks the last-mile delivery system that puts information in the hands of the harvester when it matters most.

Critical technology failures:

• No real-time buoy data accessibility with user-friendly hourly updates for wave frequency and storm surge prediction
• Data siloing between NOAA and state agencies like Maine Department of Marine Resources, preventing a unified view of the regional coastline
• Poor UI and UX in existing electronic vessel trip reports, forcing tired crews to spend extra time on data entry after exhausting shifts
• No interoperability between vessel GPS and management maps, leading to accidental incursions into closed areas and expensive violations
• High cost of satellite communication uptime offshore, making real-time reporting and safety systems financially unfeasible

Technologically, small boats need a system that recognizes their specific constraints. A forty-foot boat in rough seas can’t navigate complex software interfaces or wait for slow data loads. The platform must deliver instant, actionable intelligence or it’s useless.

Safety Data Nobody Talks About

Commercial fishing remains the most dangerous occupation in the United States, with a fatal injury rate of two hundred per one hundred thousand workers. That’s compared to 3.3 per one hundred thousand for the general workforce. Vessels are lost at an average rate of ninety per year in New England alone.

For small-boat outfits, safety is fundamentally a data problem: knowing when to stay in port and how to handle emergencies when offshore. The qualitative evidence suggests that “never one thing sinks a boat.” It’s always a series of events, starting with poor data on weather or vessel stability.

The social dimension is often overlooked. Chronic pain and injury impact harvester health over decades. Substance use and drug-related problems plague fishing ports. COVID-19 infection control became a labor access crisis on small vessels. Mental health stressors from regulatory pressure and economic uncertainty compound the physical dangers.

What fishermen actually need for safety:

• Micro-climate weather alerts for localized nor’easters that affect small vessels differently than large boats
• Real-time wave frequency data to make go or no-go decisions before leaving the dock
• Crew manifest and terms of employment templates for legal protection in injury cases
• Fatigue management tools to track sleep deprivation and reduce human error

Small outfits need a platform that integrates safety checklists, weather alerts, and labor manifests into their daily workflow, reinforcing a culture of integrated preparedness.

The Psychology of Distrust

There’s a profound credibility gap between federal scientific models and the small-boat fleet. Fishermen witness species range shifts years before they appear in quota allocations. They see black sea bass moving north in massive numbers while their quotas remain based on outdated catch history from decades ago.

Qualitative testimony from public hearings reveals a pervasive belief that NOAA scientists “ignore data to fit their own models.” Captains observe what they call “carnage” on their decks, massive bycatch of species that aren’t supposed to be in those waters according to federal assessments.

This distrust extends to Electronic Monitoring systems. While EM is technically more efficient than human observers, fishermen fear video data will be used for “gotcha” enforcement rather than scientific catch accounting. The platform my brother is researching needs to address this head-on by allowing fishermen to see their own data and understand how it’s being audited. If the system provides a pre-audit check that helps a captain avoid a slippage violation before official data is uploaded, it transitions from a surveillance tool to a protective asset.

What the Optimal Platform Actually Needs

Based on the hundred pain points and the statistical landscape, the platform must be built on a multi-layered data engine addressing three pillars of small-boat survival: safety, profit, and compliance.

The scraped data architecture should cover five clusters:

Physical oceanography: NERACOOS ERDDAP servers, NDBC buoys, NECOFS models updated hourly for life-safety decisions and species movement prediction via thermal niches.

Market pricing: BASE New Bedford auction, CASE Gloucester auction, Whaling City portal with real-time updates during auction hours to prevent revenue loss from informational disconnect.

Regulatory status: Federal Register Amendment 23 updates, NEFMC meeting logs, GARFO notices updated daily to avoid closures and track quota lease prices.

Biological threats: Maine DMR PSP forecasts, green crab demographics, HAB trajectories updated weekly to manage aquaculture risk and predict future yield.

Infrastructure and logistics: Municipal GIS portals, working waterfront inventories, fuel price boards updated weekly to navigate port-side services and defend against gentrification.

The physical oceanography layer is particularly critical. Each buoy in the NERACOOS network sends hourly updates on over fifty variables. For a small boat, knowing that a subsurface thermal front has moved five miles east can mean the difference between a skunked trip and a full hold.

Three Tools That Would Change Everything

The platform can’t be a collection of PDFs. It must be a structured, API-driven dashboard with specific tools:

Market Delta Tool: Calculates steaming cost versus price delta. If New Bedford is paying fifty cents per pound more for cod than Gloucester, but the vessel is currently in Salem, the app calculates whether the extra fuel and time justify the price gain. This turns a gut-feeling decision into a math problem.

Monitoring Cost Calculator: Tracks the monitor waiver status for specific sectors. When the GARFO regional administrator issues a waiver due to lack of funding, vessels need to know instantly so they can fish without a twelve-hundred-dollar-per-day monitor.

Bycatch Avoidance Map: Scraped real-time data from the River Herring Avoidance Program showing hotspots of bycatch that could trigger early season closures for the entire fleet. Small boats can route around problem areas and protect both their season and the broader fishery.

The Future Is About Responsiveness

The future of New England fisheries will be defined by responsiveness to environmental change. The Blue Economy is shifting from wild-harvest dominance to a hybrid model including offshore wind, increased aquaculture, and changes in shipping traffic due to reduced high-latitude ice.

Small outfits that fail to adopt a data-driven approach will be consolidated out of existence. The economic forces are too strong and the regulatory burden too heavy for traditional methods to survive. But the data-scraped platform provides a technical equalizer. By democratizing access to live auction prices, quota markets, and subsurface oceanography, the platform allows a forty-foot boat to operate with the same informational sophistication as a hundred-foot industrial trawler.

The ultimate utility lies in supporting integrated preparedness. Whether preparing for a nor’easter, a sudden PSP closure, or the next regulatory shift in Amendment 23, the platform serves as digital mettle that allows the independent fisherman to face demanding situations in a spirited and resilient way.

The Feeling

There’s something both devastating and energizing about uncovering this information. Watching my brother dig into the specifics of New England fisheries data scraping, I expected technical challenges and maybe some interesting industry quirks. What I found instead was a entire economic class being systematically squeezed out of existence by information inequality.

The research has a weight to it. Reading through testimony from public hearings where third-generation fishermen describe choosing between paying for a monitor or making their mortgage payment feels like witnessing something important collapse in slow motion. These aren’t abstract policy debates. They’re families losing livelihoods that stretch back centuries because they can’t afford a twelve-hundred-dollar surveillance tax on every fishing trip.

But there’s also an undercurrent of excitement running through all of this. This is domain-specific knowledge that’s incredibly hard to access without doing the actual work. You can’t Google “why are small fishing boats failing” and get the real answer. You have to read through fishery management plan amendments, dig through auction price data from obscure portals, understand the difference between Potential Sector Contributions and Acceptable Biological Catch caps, and synthesize qualitative testimony with quantitative trends.

The density of information is thrilling in a nerdy way. Learning that U-10 scallops command fifteen dollars per pound more than 30-40 count scallops, or that NERACOOS buoys send hourly updates on over fifty variables, or that black sea bass are moving north faster than federal quota models can track—each of these details builds into a comprehensive picture that very few people outside the industry ever see.

There’s frustration, too. The solutions feel obvious once you understand the problem. Build a dashboard that scrapes auction data and tells captains where to land their catch. Aggregate subsurface temperature readings and predict species movement. Create a monitoring cost calculator that tracks waiver status in real time. These aren’t moonshot ideas. They’re straightforward technical implementations that could genuinely save small fishing operations.

The emotional core is this: I’m watching an entire industry structure fail not because the work is impossible or the resource is depleted, but because information flows to the wrong people at the wrong speed. The big boats have administrative teams. The small boats have WhatsApp groups and rumors. And that gap, more than any environmental change or regulatory burden, is what’s killing the New England small-boat fleet.

My brother’s project feels important now in a way it didn’t when he first described it. It’s not just test data scraping. It’s building the infrastructure that could determine whether family-owned fishing vessels survive the next decade. And the fact that this level of detailed, actionable knowledge exists but isn’t readily available anywhere else makes the whole thing feel urgent and valuable and a little bit secret—like we’ve stumbled into understanding something that matters more than most people realize.

I was cooking chicken breast the other day and hit a familiar wall. What temperature should I actually pull it from the oven? I’ve been doing 152°F for years, but I realized I’d never properly validated that number. I didn’t want to just Google it and land on one random blog post. I didn’t want to just ask ChatGPT and get a single synthesized answer. I wanted something statistically significant.

My conclusion: Google Gemini Deep Research is now my go-to tool for this kind of problem. It aggregated 50 real-world temperature recommendations from cooking forums, ran the stats, and confirmed that the median preferred temp is 155°F. I was at 152°F, so I’m pretty much nailed it. More importantly, the process gave me a repeatable framework for solving problems where I need distributed consensus, not just expert opinion.

The Core Problem: One Source Isn’t Enough Anymore

Here’s how I used to approach questions like this. I’d search “chicken breast internal temp,” click the first article, and either trust it or feel vaguely unsatisfied. Maybe I’d check a second source if the first one seemed sketchy. But that’s not actually research. That’s just confirmation bias with extra steps.

The issue is that most everyday problems don’t have a single authoritative answer. Chicken temp is a perfect example. The USDA says 165°F. But if you’ve ever cooked to that number, you know the result: dry, chalky, borderline cardboard. So clearly, the federal guideline isn’t optimized for quality. It’s optimized for liability.

What I actually wanted was to know what people who care about this are doing. Not one person. Not one chef. I wanted the wisdom of the crowd, filtered through people who’ve debugged this exact problem hundreds of times.

Enter AI Research Tools

This is where tools like Google Gemini Deep Research, Perplexity, and ChatGPT’s research mode shine. I don’t use them to get a single answer. I use them to do the boring, repetitive work of aggregating dozens of sources and finding patterns.

Here’s what I asked Gemini: “Pull 50 different instances of chicken breast cooking temperature recommendations from forums around the web and create a statistical analysis of where they fall.”

That’s it. No complicated prompt engineering. Just a clear ask for breadth and rigor.

What Gemini Actually Did

Gemini went out and scraped recommendations from Reddit’s cooking communities, eGullet, Chowhound, and other forums. It pulled 50 independent data points from real users who’d posted their preferred internal temps. Then it standardized the data (turning ranges like “150-155°F” into medians), calculated descriptive stats, and identified clusters.

The output was genuinely impressive. It gave me:

• Median temp: 155°F
• Mode: 155°F (appeared 15 times)
• Mean: 156.4°F
• Range: 140°F to 168°F
• Standard deviation: ~5.8°F

It also broke the data into philosophical clusters. There’s the “USDA Loyalists” who stick to 165°F (18% of the sample). There’s the “Sweet Spot Consensus” at 155°F (42% of the sample). And there’s a smaller group of “Texture Technicians” who pull at 150°F and rely heavily on carryover cooking.

One friction point: Gemini’s output was extremely verbose. The report it generated was over 6,000 words, written in this pseudo-academic tone with headings like “The Thermal Dialectic” and references to the chicken’s scientific name (Gallus gallus domesticus). I didn’t ask for that. I just wanted the stats. But I can skim, so it wasn’t a dealbreaker.

Why This Approach Works

The reason this method is so effective is that it bypasses two common failure modes:

1. Authority bias: When you ask a single expert or AI model, you get one perspective shaped by that source’s training data or personal experience. That might be fine for settled science, but for subjective, context-dependent questions (like how to cook meat), you need variance.
2. Anecdata: When you ask friends or scroll through a single Reddit thread, you’re sampling a tiny, non-representative slice of opinion. You might land on the one guy who insists 145°F is fine, or the one who burns everything to 175°F out of paranoia.

By forcing the AI to aggregate 50 independent sources and run the numbers, I’m effectively crowdsourcing the answer. I’m not trusting Gemini’s opinion. I’m trusting the collective trial-and-error of hundreds of home cooks who’ve debugged this problem in their own kitchens.

The Practical Takeaway on Chicken

The actual finding confirmed what I’d been doing intuitively. The forum consensus is clear: pull chicken breast at 155°F, rest it for 5-10 minutes, and it’ll coast up to 160-162°F via carryover heat. That’s hot enough to pasteurize any pathogens (you only need 50 seconds at 155°F for a 7-log reduction of Salmonella), but cool enough that you don’t squeeze all the moisture out of the muscle fibers.

The 165°F USDA recommendation is designed for instant lethality. You hit that temp, bacteria die in under 10 seconds, and you’re safe. But you don’t need instant lethality if you’re willing to hold the meat at a lower temp for a minute or two. That’s the insight the crowd figured out, and it’s the insight the federal guidelines ignore because they’re optimized for worst-case scenarios and institutional liability.

One specific friction point even in the 155°F camp: you absolutely need a reliable instant-read thermometer. You can’t guess this by feel or time. I use a cheap digital probe, and it’s the single most important tool in my kitchen for this reason.

How You Can Repeat This Process

This framework works for any problem where you need distributed consensus:

• Step 1: Identify a question where expert opinion might be too narrow or outdated, but where lots of people have real-world experience. Examples: best running shoes for flat feet, how to structure a cold email, what time to arrive at TSA for a specific airport.
• Step 2: Ask an AI research tool (Gemini Deep Research, Perplexity, ChatGPT) to pull a specific number of sources. I like 50 because it’s large enough to smooth out outliers but small enough that the AI won’t hallucinate or pad the data.
• Step 3: Request a statistical breakdown. Don’t just ask for a summary. Ask for the median, mode, range, and clusters. This forces the AI to show its work and gives you a sense of how much agreement actually exists.
• Step 4: Skim the output for the “why.” The stats tell you what people do. The forum quotes and explanations tell you why they do it. That context helps you decide if their reasoning applies to your situation.
• Step 5: Validate the finding against your own experience. In my case, I’d been pulling chicken at 152°F and it was working great. The research confirmed I was in the right ballpark and gave me confidence to nudge up to 155°F.

The Feeling

There’s something deeply satisfying about this approach. It’s not the thrill of discovering some secret hack that no one else knows. It’s the opposite. It’s the relief of confirming that a bunch of thoughtful people have already debugged this problem, and their collective answer is both rigorous and practical.

It also scratches a specific itch I have around problem-solving. I don’t want to blindly follow rules (the USDA’s 165°F), but I also don’t want to just wing it and hope for the best. I want to understand the underlying trade-offs (safety vs. texture, time vs. temperature), and I want to know where the consensus has landed after thousands of people have run the experiment in their own kitchens.

Using AI research tools this way feels like having a tireless research assistant who can read 50 forum threads in 30 seconds and hand you a spreadsheet. It’s not replacing my thinking. It’s just doing the boring part so I can focus on the decision.

And yeah, my chicken is better now.

I went to Wayla, a Thai restaurant in New York, on a Saturday night with a group of friends before meeting up with more people at a bar.

Is Wayla Worth It?

Go, but skip Saturday nights. The food is legitimately excellent. That fried branzino alone is worth the trip. However, the weekend crowd turns the whole experience into a chaotic numbers game that undercuts what could otherwise be a really special meal.

Wayla’s Saturday Night Chaos

Wayla is down a flight of stairs, and the second you descend, you are hit with how packed it is. Dark and narrow with servers sprinting between tables, plus a frazzled host trying to manage a bottleneck at the entrance because some group ahead of us forgot to make a reservation. I gave my name and got shuffled through the main dining room, which is actually quite nice. It is cozy and railroad style while stretching way back through half the block. But that is not where I ended up.

Emergency Tent Patio Setup

They walked me outside to the patio where they have set up these plastic emergency tents. I am talking the kind you see at a marathon finish line for race EMTs. They are just randomly scattered around with no real cohesion to the layout. It felt like they were jamming in as many people as possible rather than creating an actual dining environment. I was not getting “charming outdoor seating” but rather “overflow holding area.” Not cozy. Not what you want when you are paying good money for Thai food.

Attentive Service at Wayla

The server was attentive from the jump. They took my drink order immediately and walked us through the menu while happily answering questions. That mattered because Wayla’s menu is extensive. There are lots of spicy options and lots of non spicy options, which I appreciate. Thai food can be intimidating if you are not used to the heat levels, and they have clearly thought about accessibility without dumbing anything down.

The Whole Fried Branzino (Larb Pla Tod)

I had looked it up on Perplexity beforehand, and everything pointed to the whole branzino (larb pla tod). I am usually skeptical of whole fish in restaurants because it is so easy to overcook, and you end up with dry, flaky nonsense. But this one is fried, and frying is more forgiving because the batter insulates the protein and keeps it juicy.

When it arrived, the presentation was wild. The fish is arranged in this spiral, almost like it is protecting the meat. The bones are already removed, which is a huge relief because picking through bones mid meal is always annoying. The execution was spot on:

• Light, crispy batter that was not heavy or greasy
• Meaty, substantial fish with more texture than your typical fried cod or fish and chips haddock
• Perfectly seasoned, still juicy and tender
• Chunked into nuggets for easy eating

But the real genius is the lime vinaigrette pooled at the bottom of the plate. You dip the fried fish into it, and it cuts right through the richness of the batter. Fresh, aromatic, and quintessentially Thai. That balance of crispy, fatty fish meeting bright, acidic dressing is what makes the dish special.

Wayla’s Menu Quality and Price

Food came out fast. Everyone liked what they ordered. The quality is undeniable, and you can taste where your money is going. This is not cheap, but it is not a rip off either.

Best Times to Visit Wayla

I would go back. I liked it. But I would be strategic about timing. Saturday night Wayla is too much. It is that specific New York restaurant feeling where you are just a reservation number rather than a guest. The chaos, the tent city patio, and the harried staff all add up to an experience that is more stressful than enjoyable, even when the food delivers.

For a group of four heading out to meet more people afterward? It worked. It was a solid pre bar dinner. But I am not rushing back. That said, I can absolutely see myself craving that branzino in six months and making a Tuesday or Wednesday reservation to get the full experience without the weekend circus.

The Wayla Experience

There is this specific sensation at overpacked New York restaurants where the energy tips from “buzzy” into “suffocating,” and Saturday night Wayla lives right on that edge. You are sitting under a plastic tent that feels temporary and almost apologetic while servers sprint past and voices blend into a low roar. It is not unpleasant, exactly. It is just relentless. You are aware the whole time that the restaurant is operating at maximum capacity and that you are part of a tightly choreographed rotation designed to turn tables.

But then the food arrives, and for a few minutes, none of that matters. That first bite of the branzino is crispy, hot, and perfectly seasoned. When paired with the sharp lime vinaigrette, you suddenly understand why people put up with the chaos. It is a reminder that even when the experience around the meal is compromised, the meal itself can still be worth showing up for. The memory I am left with is not the tent or the crowd or the stairs. It is the taste of that fish and the quiet satisfaction of knowing I had found something genuinely good in the middle of all the noise.

I wanted a really good meal. I felt restless and wanted an evening that would pull me fully into itself. I asked AI what Redditors thought was the most delicious meal they had eaten in the past couple of years, and one place came up repeatedly: Luthun. It was in my neighborhood, and I realized I had walked past it without ever going in. I decided to change that and walked over.

Inside, the space was clean and contemporary, with an open kitchen that immediately set the tone. The staff greeted me, took my reservation code, and asked what I wanted to drink. Everything moved easily and with intention. They asked where I was coming from, and the conversation unfolded naturally. When the sommelier joined me, he asked what I liked to drink and listened closely.

I chose to order wine as the meal progressed. I started by asking for high acidity and strong minerality. He brought a wine from Argentina that felt sharp and focused, and it set the pace for the evening.

For the next course, I asked for a skin contact wine. The bottle he selected opened slowly, with a light smokiness and depth that revealed itself over time. It stayed present throughout the course and worked closely with the food.

With the beef, I ordered a medium-bodied red with high acidity. It carried the dish cleanly and completed the arc of the wines. I ordered a digestif at the end, which closed the meal quietly.

The food was consistently excellent. The lightly fried scallops stood out most, cooked precisely and rich in texture. The sauces throughout the meal were balanced and composed, supporting each dish without pulling focus. A frisée salad treated with liquid nitrogen brought a crisp, fleeting texture that added interest to the course.

What stayed with me was the clarity of the experience. The food, the wine, the pacing, and the room all felt guided by a steady point of view. The evening held together from start to finish.

I left feeling settled. I had come in wanting a great meal, and I walked out with the sense that the time had been well spent. It was one of the best meals I have had in New York, and it stayed with me in a quiet, lasting way.

This isn’t a “best of New York” list. It’s a set of things that made day-to-day life here noticeably better after a year of trial, error, and mild overcommitment.

Live somewhere walkable, even if it costs more.
Being able to walk to coffee, groceries, bars, parks, and friends changes how often you actually use the city. Central neighborhoods beat “nice but remote” ones. If you can walk most places, the city feels smaller and calmer.

Optimize for your daily radius, not your weekend fantasies.
It’s tempting to pick a neighborhood based on where you might go. Pick based on where you actually end up going on a Tuesday night. Your regular routes matter more than edge cases.

Say yes early, then get selective later.
The first six to nine months are for sampling. Go to things. Accept random invitations. Use social apps if that lowers friction.

Don’t confuse busyness with connection.
New York makes it easy to be socially full but relationally thin. That’s normal. The goal isn’t more plans, it’s seeing the same people again without effort.

Let the city regulate you instead of pushing against it.
You don’t need to extract everything from New York. You don’t need to “do the most.” Some weeks are loud. Some are quiet. Both count.

Walk as much as possible.
Walking is the cheat code. Transit is efficient, but walking teaches you where you actually are.

Expect housing to be temporary, and don’t panic about it.
Month-to-month living feels unstable until you realize that flexibility is the feature.

Spend money on access, not status.
Pay for things that reduce friction: proximity, convenience, time.

Use the city instead of escaping it.
Ironically, living here reduced my urge to travel.

Accept that NYC won’t give you direction.
A city is a container, not a compass.

If New York works for you, it’ll feel like a place that quietly supports a lot of different lives at once, including yours.

Sushi Lin Park Slope is an easy recommendation and a place I would gladly return to. The space is clean, calm, and inviting, and the service is consistently attentive without feeling rushed. Water was always topped off, and the staff were genuinely friendly and professional throughout the meal.

The sushi stands out for its quality and composition. The nigiri feels intentional rather than formulaic, with combinations that go beyond a standard omakase. The salmon with tomato was the clear standout. It was an unexpected pairing and genuinely excellent. The uni was fresh and deeply flavorful, the salmon across the board had a rich, buttery texture, and the scallop was especially smooth and luxurious. Overall, the fish quality was outstanding.

I ordered the 10-piece omakase with a hand roll, and nearly every bite delivered. The only miss was a small tuna tartare bite on a cracker with cucumber. It was fine, but far less interesting than the rest of the meal.

Great fish, thoughtful execution, and strong service make Sushi Lin Park Slope a reliable choice for high-quality sushi in the neighborhood.

I recently went on a walk from the George Washington Bridge near 175th St in Manhattan down the path all the way to 96th. The path doesn’t follow the Hudson the entire way, but overall it’s a lovely walk. It’s quiet, especially in January. And there’s a surprising amount of nature for being Manhattan.

I found The Recognitions interesting at first, especially in the way it jumps between characters and scenes. There is some sharp dialogue and a few moments that really stand out, and I liked how much academic and historical material gets woven in. That part felt ambitious and kind of exciting. But after about a hundred pages, the structure started to wear me down. It felt too chaotic for me to follow any clear storyline, and I never got a strong sense of where it was headed. I was not bored so much as tired of the effort it took to keep track of everything. Eventually it felt like I was just moving through a series of loosely connected scenes rather than a developing narrative, and I could not quite stick with it.